1. Identify the Monitored Rail and Exact Variant

Begin with the function the released circuit requires. Ask the design owner which rail is monitored, which device receives reset and what conditions require reset assertion. Record the existing supervisor's full ordering code and schematic reference. Keep the circuit's monitored voltage separate from the supply used to power the supervisor itself; obtain the actual connection information from the design documentation.

TI's TPS3808 information describes fixed-threshold and adjustable options and an open-drain reset response to its SENSE input. The current datasheet explains the sense threshold and hysteresis. That example supports checking the exact variant rather than treating the family name as a complete requirement. This article does not prescribe a threshold for a customer's processor or infer approval from a product selector.

For the review record, retain the documented threshold specification and conditions beside the processor or system requirement. If the design uses an adjustable configuration, identify the relevant circuit and approved external components. Mark unknown inputs for engineering clarification. Avoid replacing that record with the nominal name of the rail or a supplier's shortened description.

  • Identify monitored rail, reset recipient and original full code.
  • Separate sense configuration from supervisor supply connections.
  • Retain threshold evidence and the design requirement together.

2. Confirm Reset Polarity and the Output Interface

Record whether reset is active low or active high and which output driver the circuit expects. Ask engineering to reconcile that interface with the receiving input and any existing pullup or other circuitry. A replacement proposal should name its documented output function rather than assume that all devices sold as supervisors have the same reset connection.

The TPS3808 example uses an active-low, open-drain RESET output. Its current documentation describes the conditions for assertion and release. Those are device-specific facts, not a universal pinout or operating rule. Preserve the exact datasheet section and ask the design owner to check the complete connection, including behaviour when the relevant supplies are starting or absent.

Keep package and terminal assignment in a separate check. A matching package description does not show that sense, supply, timing and reset pins share the same functions. If a candidate needs different external connections, record the proposed change explicitly. This preparation record helps purchasing distinguish an approved item from a redesign proposal awaiting evaluation.

  • Specify reset polarity and output driver type.
  • Link the receiver and external output circuitry to the review.
  • Record pin-function differences separately from package identity.

3. Preserve Delay and Manual-Reset Requirements

Ask the design owner to define when reset should be released and which timing conditions matter. Keep that requirement distinct from the voltage threshold. Record whether the delay is fixed by the chosen variant, configured externally or controlled through another documented method. Use the exact datasheet rather than transferring a timing value from a related product.

TI's TPS3808 datasheet describes configurable reset delay through its CT pin and a manual-reset input. It explains that release follows the relevant sense and manual-reset conditions and the selected delay. The public example shows why the configuration belongs in the sourcing requirement. No delay value or external component calculation is supplied here for an unidentified customer circuit.

If a manual-reset input is used, retain the source of that signal and the required behaviour in the review record. If it is unused, ask engineering to confirm the applicable connection rule for the exact device. Keep startup, reset assertion and reset release questions identifiable. They may require different evidence and should not disappear into one spreadsheet field labelled timing.

  • Specify release-delay requirements and configuration method.
  • Identify the manual-reset signal or its documented unused state.
  • Keep unresolved startup and timing conditions visible.

4. Submit the Defined Function for Technical and Supply Review

Prepare a function comparison for the original item and each proposed candidate. Suggested columns are threshold evidence, output interface, delay configuration, manual-reset use, pin mapping and review status. Ask the design owner to identify any additional application checks. A favourable entry in one column cannot stand in for a complete decision on the requested reset function.

Once a component is approved, preserve its exact ordering code and the associated circuit requirements in the controlled BOM or linked review record. Keep alternatives identifiable until the responsible engineer approves them. If a change is accepted, update the revision and inquiry references before treating an offer for that candidate as a quote for the released requirement.

For an ICULTRA sourcing review, send the approved supervisor code, quantity and relevant document references. Describe unresolved variant or configuration questions separately. Ask suppliers to identify any proposed changes and confirm current offer conditions for the exact item. This checklist defines technical inputs; it does not report a board test, a validated processor reset sequence or an available stock allocation.

Sources and further reading

TI's current TPS3808 documentation supplies a device-specific reset-function example. The comparison fields are preparation suggestions; they do not approve another device, validate a processor sequence or establish component availability.